Friday, September 13, 2013

How To Make A Trash Car

1.  First bring some caps of bottle and make a hole in the middle of the bottle caps.

2. Then cut a cardboard in rectangle shape (10 cm).

3Then put stick in the middle of bottle cap.

4Put a straw in the side of the cardboard and glue it.

5Put the stick in the middle of the straw.

6 . Fit a motor in the back of the board.

7Fit it with battery and put a small curve piece like fan.

8.  When you switch on the motor the wind pushes the board and the car will move … Enjoy.

Sunday, September 8, 2013

The Solar System

The Solar System[a] comprises the Sun and its planetary system of eight planets, their moons, and other non-stellar objects.[b][c] It formed 4.6 billion years ago from the gravitational collapse of a giant molecular cloud. The vast majority of the system's mass is in the Sun, with most of the remaining mass contained in Jupiter. The four smaller inner planets, Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars, also called the terrestrial planets, are primarily composed of rock and metal. The four outer planets, called the gas giants, are substantially more massive than the terrestrials. The two largest, Jupiter and Saturn, are composed mainly of hydrogen and helium; the two outermost planets, Uranus and Neptune, are composed largely of substances with relatively high melting points (compared with hydrogen and helium), called ices, such as water, ammonia and methane, and are often referred to separately as "ice giants". All planets have almost circular orbits that lie within a nearly flat disc called the ecliptic plane.

The Solar System also contains a number of regions populated by smaller objects.[b] The asteroid belt, which lies between Mars and Jupiter, is similar to the terrestrial planets as it mostly contains objects composed of rock and metal. Beyond Neptune's orbit lie the Kuiper belt and scattered disc, linked populations of trans-Neptunian objects composed mostly of ices. Within these populations are several dozen to more than ten thousand objects that may be large enough to have been rounded by their own gravity.[10] Such objects are referred to as dwarf planets. Identified dwarf planets include the asteroid Ceres and the trans-Neptunian objects Pluto, Eris, Haumea, and Makemake.[b] In addition to these two regions, various other small-body populations including comets, centaurs and interplanetary dust freely travel between regions. Six of the planets, at least three of the dwarf planets, and many of the smaller bodies are orbited by natural satellites,[d] usually termed "moons" after Earth's Moon. Each of the outer planets is encircled by planetary rings of dust and other small objects.

The solar wind, a flow of plasma from the Sun, creates a bubble in the interstellar medium known as the heliosphere, which extends out to the edge of the scattered disc. The Oort cloud, which is believed to be the source for long-period comets, may also exist at a distance roughly a thousand times further than the heliosphere. The heliopause is the point at which pressure from the solar wind is equal to the opposing pressure of interstellar wind. The Solar System is located within one of the outer arms of the Milky Way galaxy, which contains about 200 billion stars.

Source: Wikipedia

Saturday, September 7, 2013

What is LAN



A local area network (LAN) is a computer network that interconnects computers in a limited area such as a home, school, computer laboratory, or office building using network media.[1] The defining characteristics of LANs, in contrast to wide area networks (WANs), include their usually higher data-transfer rates, smaller geographic area, and lack of a need for leased telecommunication lines.

[ use of computers in universities and research labs in the late 1960s generated the need to provide high-speed interconnections between computer systems. A 1970 report from the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory detailing the growth of their "Octopus" network[2][3] gave a good indication of the situation.

Cambridge Ring was developed at Cambridge University in 1974[4] but was never developed into a successful commercial product.

Ethernet was developed at Xerox PARC in 1973–1975,[5] and filed as U.S. Patent 4,063,220. In 1976, after the system was deployed at PARC, Metcalfe and Boggs published a seminal paper, "Ethernet: Distributed Packet-Switching For Local Computer Networks."[6]

ARCNET was developed by Datapoint Corporation in 1976 and announced in 1977.[7] It had the first commercial installation in December 1977 at Chase Manhattan Bank in New York.[8]

Contents

Standards evolution

The development and proliferation of personal computers using the CP/M operating system in the late 1970s, and later DOS-based systems starting in 1981, meant that many sites grew to dozens or even hundreds of computers. The initial driving force for networking was generally to share storage and printers, which were both expensive at the time. There was much enthusiasm for the concept and for several years, from about 1983 onward, computer industry pundits would regularly declare the coming year to be “the year of the LAN”.[9][10][11]

In practice, the concept was marred by proliferation of incompatible physical layer and network protocol implementations, and a plethora of methods of sharing resources. Typically, each vendor would have its own type of network card, cabling, protocol, and network operating system. A solution appeared with the advent of Novell NetWare which provided even-handed support for dozens of competing card/cable types, and a much more sophisticated operating system than most of its competitors. Netware dominated[12] the personal computer LAN business from early after its introduction in 1983 until the mid-1990s when Microsoft introduced Windows NT Advanced Server and Windows for Workgroups.

Of the competitors to NetWare, only Banyan Vines had comparable technical strengths, but Banyan never gained a secure base. Microsoft and 3Com worked together to create a simple network operating system which formed the base of 3Com's 3+Share, Microsoft's LAN Manager and IBM's LAN Server - but none of these was particularly successful.

During the same period, Unix computer workstations from vendors such as Sun Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard, Silicon Graphics, Intergraph, NeXT and Apollo were using TCP/IP based networking. Although this market segment is now much reduced, the technologies developed in this area continue to be influential on the Internet and in both Linux and Apple Mac OS X networking—and the TCP/IP protocol has now almost completely replaced IPX, AppleTalk, NBF, and other protocols used by the early PC LANs.

Cabling

Early LAN cabling had been based on various grades of coaxial cable. Shielded twisted pair was used in IBM's Token Ring LAN implementation. In 1984, StarLAN showed the potential of simple unshielded twisted pair by using Cat3 cable—the same simple cable used for telephone systems. This led to the development of 10Base-T (and its successors) and structured cabling which is still the basis of most commercial LANs today. In addition, fiber-optic cabling is increasingly used in commercial applications.

As cabling is not always possible, Wi-Fi is now very common in residential premises, and elsewhere where support for laptops and smartphones is important.

Technical aspects

Network topology describes the layout of interconnections between devices and network segments. At the Data Link Layer and Physical Layer, a wide variety of LAN topologies have been used, including ring, bus, mesh and star, but the most common LAN topology in use today is switched Ethernet. At the higher layers, the Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) has become the standard, replacing NetBEUI, IPX/SPX, AppleTalk and others.

Simple LANs generally consist of one or more switches. A switch can be connected to a router, cable modem, or ADSL modem for Internet access. Complex LANs are characterized by their use of redundant links with switches using the spanning tree protocol to prevent loops, their ability to manage differing traffic types via quality of service (QoS), and to segregate traffic with VLANs. A LAN can include a wide variety of network devices such as switches, firewalls, routers, load balancers, and sensors.[13]

LANs can maintain connections with other LANs via leased lines, leased services, or the Internet using virtual private network technologies. Depending on how the connections are established and secured in a LAN, and the distance involved, a LAN may also be classified as a metropolitan area network (MAN) or a wide area network (WAN).

Source: Wikipedia

How long can the CM Punk – Paul Heyman feud continue


Paul Heyman and CM Punk have had quite a few entertaining and intense interactions. The seeds for the feud were planted when Punk returned on the Payback Pay Per View.

The attention on this possible and inevitable break-up between two of WWE’s noteworthy characters skyrocketed when Brock Lesnar returned to attack Punk and thus renewed the interest surrounding the long awaited fight between the ‘Paul Heyman Guys’.

Since then the proceedings of this feud between these former friends have been good so far, however, it seems harder to find a purpose to this feud every week.

I mean, how long can it be entertaining? I did not quite enjoy Punk’s promo last week. His talking style has changed a bit but that’s okay. He can pull it off, but he had nothing new to say. He is going to attack Heyman. He wants to get his hands on Heyman etcetera, etcetera.

Punk’s promo last week was very formulaic, a text book WWE babyface promo. He should rather be a textbook anti-hero. I find Punk to be much more entertaining when he is p****d off, when he doesn’t care that he’s getting booed or cheered, when he wants immediate actions to follow his promos.

He’s popular because he does not follow many WWE formulas. Telling the crowd what he feels is more like Punk. Telling the audience what he’s going to do to someone on a Pay Per View is a WWE formula. Last week wasn’t the first time he talked that way though.

CM Punk is usually the more entertaining guy in most of his feuds. But this time, arguably, Paul Heyman has surpassed Punk as far as entertainment is concerned.

All that guy has got is a terrific sense of drama, if not wrestling. His promos are always the best on every show since he’s returned. He knows when to start and when to stop. He’s never seemed like overdoing his piece. He is coherent and gets the desired reaction. Even when he screams, even when he pleads, even when falls and even when he’s attacked- his reaction is always been pure gold. Nobody’s been as consistent as him.

What this feud needs, in my opinion, is not Punk finally getting his hands on Punk, but Heyman introducing many more adversaries to make Punk’s life a living hell.

This feud should continue for these two characters have a lot of depth, but it should be elevated by Heyman trying to finish Punk and not trying to play truce.

If Punk getting his hands on Heyman has to be something special, then that action needs to be put on hold for a while. And Punk should wrestle and have a storyline with a character who can have character development with this feud and be a good roadblock for Punk to get to Heyman.

Maybe Curtis Axel can take that role rather than be a sidekick and maybe Heyman can hire one more guy or girl. Maybe in the future, Brock Lesnar can come back again to finish the job for Heyman and this time, Punk finally gets his revenge.